🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We reside in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.